The stay will remain in effect until the appeals case is heard, the filing said.Īpple had tried before to argue its case for a stay and the court denied the motion. The court additionally ruled that Apple has made a “sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and so it granted Apple’s motion to stay part of the permanent injunction. ![]() failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” Court of Appels for the Ninth Circuit (see below), the court decided Apple had demonstrated “at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games Inc. They won’t be allowed to link to or steer users to their own websites for payments from inside their apps. That means developers will have to continue to use the existing in-app purchase system Apple provides. The appeals court has now granted Apple more time before the injunction goes into effect. Apple originally had until December 9 to update its App Store policies, but had asked the court for a stay on the injunction regarding the changes to its in-app purchasing guidelines until the appeal was decided. ![]() Both Apple and Epic appealed the original ruling - Epic because it was not successful with its larger claims, and Apple because it disagreed with this aspect of the ruling over in-app purchases. While Apple largely won that case, as the court ruled Apple was not acting as a monopolist - the company had been ordered to stop preventing app developers from adding links that pointed users to other means of paying for their in-app purchases outside the App Store. Apple will not have to implement changes to its in-app purchase system and App Store guidelines as ordered by the judge’s ruling in its court battle with Epic Games.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |